Most seen reports
|
I actually knew this site is a scam, but i chose to give it a try. All my funds were frozen even after paying all the tax they still could not withdraw. I had t
|
Latest reviews on Scamdoc
Johns campbell
05/25/2022 at 03:38 PM
Good site . For me no scam
|
|
Asad
05/25/2022 at 02:33 PM
This site is legit and paying I received my withdrawal successfully now I am happy.
|
|
Gunga
05/25/2022 at 12:52 PM
Ordered two pairs of shoes. Received two different sizes of the poorest quality of shoes I have ever seen. Customer service gave me China address to return sh
|
|
Jeanette mccarney
05/25/2022 at 11:05 AM
Scam
|
|
AaronJ
05/25/2022 at 10:48 AM
I have come to realize that there are SCAMMERS everywhere, they stopped paying for just no fvcking reason and I know they took my btc as well. And I have a lot
|
|
cari g
05/25/2022 at 10:03 AM
this is not a scam and it is unfair that this rating is so low. there are scammers that pretend to be CFX but no one has been scammed by the genuine company an
|
Analysis of the website
"Zetbull.com"
Very bad trust index
Warning, only for experienced users!
-
The domain name of this site is old: this is a good point!
-
HTTPS protocol detected. Beware as it does not always mean security
-
Many bad reviews detected on the Internet
-
The owner of the domain name is hidden: check privacy policies!
The scoring and indications provided by ScamDoc are calculated via a complex algorithm. They reflect the trust you can give to the website. Please note that ScamDoc site publishers do not influence the rating of a specific domain or url.
Site owners can provide identification information likely to improve the trust index.
Detailed information about
Zetbull.com
| Domain creation date | 05/15/2019 (Over 2 years) |
| Domain expiration date | 05/15/2029 (In over a year) |
| Owner identification in the Whois | The owner of the domain name is hidden in the Whois
|
| User reviews on Scamdoc |
3 Reviews / Comments
Reviews and comments left by Internet users are sorted in chronological order and are not checked a priori
